As I've written here before, oncology and neurology experts warn that using a cell phone for ten years or more raises your risk for brain tumors 10-30%. The good news is that an innovative new cell phone case can actually protect you from the toxic EMR signal. A patient of mine brought in a Pong case
and we tested her iPhone both with and without it. The case
tremendously reduced the EMR signal going to her brain and entire body. See their website
for information about the science behind this remarkable case. Is
available for several smart phone models and is definitely a worthwhile
purchase!
Monday, April 23, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Toxic Cosmetics: Know What's in Your Medicine Cabinet
Many cosmetics contain
levels of harmful chemicals that are dangerous to your health – and
unregulated by the EPA and FDA. Are you poisoning yourself with the
soap, shampoo, lotion, toothpaste, and makeup you use? Take matters into
your own hands and educate yourself about the toxic chemicals that are
commonly found in personal care products.
In 2011, UC San Francisco researchers reported that out of 268 pregnant woman studied, 100% of them carried up to 163 chemicals that could be passed on to their fetuses.
These included pesticides and flame-retardants with proven health
risks, as well as other chemicals from everyday household products and
cosmetics. It’s important to realize that while our bodies may be able
to tolerate a single chemical in a small dose, over time we are each
exposed to thousands of chemicals that our bodies can absorb and store.
This is referred to as “body burden.” The rise of diseases such as
breast cancer, autism, and Parkinson’s parallels the rise of synthetic
chemicals in our daily lives.
Since government regulations may never catch up
with the thousands of dangerous chemicals in our everyday products,
there are a few key things you can do to protect yourself. You can
research the products you currently use at EWG’s Cosmetics Safety Database or look up individual ingredients at Toxipedia.org.
Examine labels closely. Labels on cosmetic products that tout
themselves as “all-natural,” “dermatologist-tested,” “hypoallergenic,”
“fragrance-free,” and “non-comedogenic” are meaningless. Look for products with the USDA Organic seal,
which means they contain at least 95% certified organic ingredients.
They may still contain toxins, though it won’t be as likely. Also beware
of products with the following toxic chemicals:
- Lead – We all know how dangerous lead paint is, but did you know that lead is still found in some lipsticks and hair coloring kits? This is a neurotoxicant (a toxin that can cause damage to the nervous system).
- Mercury – Another neurotoxicant, it’s sometimes listed as “thimerosol” and can be found in some cosmetics such as mascara, skin-lightening creams, and anti-aging products.
- Formaldehyde – A known carcinogen, formaldehyde is found in many nail polishes and bath products. The state of California recently discovered that some nail polish containing formaldehyde was falsely labeled as being toxin-free. Look for brands recommended by the Cosmetics Safety Database.
- Parabens – These are estrogen mimickers that can lead to cancer, and are found in shampoo.
- Triclosan – Found in antibacterial soaps and hand sanitizer, it contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria and has been linked to hormone disruption.
- Phthalates -- Another hormone disruptor, they are also linked to asthma, allergies, and liver and kidney lesions. They’re hidden in the fragrances of many products.
- Fragrance – Chemicals used to scent products can be listed as “fragrance” without any specifics to avoid revealing proprietary information. Stay away from products that use this designation.
- Nanoparticles – These are microscopic ingredients that can penetrate cell walls and have been largely untested. They’re found in lotions, makeup, and sunscreen. Check out the book Sunscreens: Biohazard for a detailed study on nanoparticles and their connection to obesity, diabetes, asthma, and ADHD.
- Petroleum -- Watch out for mineral oil, petrolatum, liquid paraffin, toluene, and xylene. These are often contaminated with the carcinogen 1,4 Dioxane.
The good news is that there are many cosmetics that have been verified to be nontoxic, such as Hemp Organics lipstick, Mineral Fusion makeup, Jane Iredale makeup, and Surya Liquid Henna Hair Color, which is available at Co-Op and Whole Foods. You can also browse through the Cosmetics Safety Database to find their best-rated products, or get really crafty and make your own.
Do you have a favorite nontoxic beauty product? If so, please share it here!
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Arsenic in Brown Rice Syrup
Recently an organic toddler soy formula using organic brown rice syrup was found to be high in arsenic by Dartmouth College researchers.
It has been known for years that rice tends to concentrate arsenic.
This is worse in rice from southern states and Bangladesh. Unless you
have the genetic polymorphism of being a "collector" of toxic metals,
your body will detoxify the arsenic you may have been exposed to. If
brown rice syrup has been a staple in your child's diet, you can do a
hair toxic metals test. The test is $55 and is easily performed with a
sample of hair. The kits are available through my office. If needed,
there are some simple steps you can take to detox arsenic.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
The Fight for GMO Labeling
Genetically Modified
Organisms, or GMOs, are not labeled on our food packaging, yet they
comprise up to 90% of common products such as corn, soybeans, and sugar
beets (and their derivatives, which include corn syrup, soy lecithin,
and corn starch). As I mentioned in a blog post last year,
it is vital to our individual health and to the health of our
environment to avoid consuming toxic and altered foods. Bacterio-toxic
(BT) corn, for example, is engineered to kill pests that threaten the
corn crop, but when we consume it, it affects the healthy bacteria in
our intestines. A European study done over ten years ago showed that GM genes can spread to people and animals. A group of organic farmers recently sued Monsanto
to have its patents on GMOs invalidated because they were worried that
GMO crops planted adjacent to their fields would contaminate their
organic crops through cross-pollination. A federal judge struck down their case, accusing the organic farmers of “creating a controversy where none exists.” While many countries in the European Union have banned GM crops, and Peru recently announced a 10-year GMO ban, in the United States it seems that big corporations like Monsanto call the shots.
How
can we avoid GMOs if we don’t know where they are? Companies that
manufacture GMOs are insistent that GMOs cause no harm to human beings,
so why do they refuse to label them? Marion Nestle,
a public policy expert who was a member of the FDA’s Food Advisory
committee when the first GM products became available in 1994,
emphasizes that “Intelligent people can argue about whether GM crops are
good, bad or indifferent for agriculture, the environment and market
economies, or whether the products are safe. But one point is clear. The
absence of labeling cannot be good in the long run for business or
American democracy.”
We need
to demand GMO labeling on our food products. A legal petition has been
filed with the FDA, asking them to require labeling of GMOs. Please sign
it at JustLabelIt.org.
Additionally, if you are a registered voter in the state of California,
you can add your signature to a ballot initiative that would allow
voters to vote on labeling GMOs. Eight hundred thousand signatures must
be collected by April 22 for this to make it onto the ballot, and signatures must be collected in person. Stop by my office to sign or visit LabelGMOs.org for more information.
While we wait to see if legislation will be passed, what can you do?
- Educate yourself by watching documentaries about modern agriculture, such as King Corn, Food Inc, and the Future of Food.
- Keep up-to-date on GMOs in the news by following The Non GMO Project’s blog, Facebook, and/or Twitter pages, and take action when you can.
- Avoid purchasing products that are likely to contain GMOs. The Center for Food Safety has a comprehensive shopping guide you can download from their site, and they also have apps for iPhone and Android.
What are your thoughts on GMOs? Share them here.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Update on FDA Supplement Ban
Supplements are still under
attack by the FDA, despite thousands of signatures on petitions and
intervention by members of the US Senate. As I mentioned in a blog post
last year, the FDA
has drafted an approval process for New Dietary Ingredients (NDIs) that
would virtually wipe out our access to all supplements currently on the
market .
Thanks in part to people who wrote to their senators and
representatives (in my office, we printed and mailed over 50 letters
from our concerned patients), Senators Orrin Hatch from Utah and Tom Harkin from Iowa arranged a meeting with the FDA in January. You can read their letter to the FDA commissioner here.
Senators
Hatch and Harkin were the original authors of the Dietary Supplement
Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA), which was designed to ensure
“access to safe, affordable, dietary supplement products.” During their
meeting they recommended that the FDA go back to the drawing board on
NDI approval and write new guidelines that do not “undermine the balance
Congress struck with DSHEA.” The FDA’s response was a resounding “no.”
Fortunately
others in Congress are acting to stop the FDA. Representative Jason
Chaffetz of Utah is urging the FDA to draft new guidelines for NDI
approval, and Representative Randy Hultgren of Illinois recently made a
one-minute speech on the floor of the House that stated his opposition
to the FDA’s supplement guidelines. You can ask your senator or representative to make a similar one-minute floor speech by sending this online letter via the Alliance for Natural Health. They also have a form you can fill out to ask your congresspeople to add their signatures to Rep. Chaffetz’s letter.
Please
act now and let your voice be heard! Now that we have Congress
listening, it’s time for all of us to work together to stop the FDA from
barring our access to the supplements we depend on for our health.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)