Saturday, November 19, 2011

How Toxic is Your Mattress?

We spend 1/3 of our lives in bed, but how can we sleep safely when there are tons of toxic chemicals used in mattresses and bedding? Most mattress companies have their materials loaded with votatile organic compounds (VOCs). A very toxic flame retardant, PDBE, alters thyroid hormone metabolism and is linked to low birth weight in babies. Its use in mattresses was banned in 2005, but if your mattress is older than this, it likely contains it. Today's conventional mattresses are treated with other types of toxic organophosphate fire retardants. Water Bader, the author of Sleep Safe in a Toxic World, states that the average conventional mattress contains more toxic chemicals than a 50-gallon drum of oil, including formaldehyde, benzene, and toulene. A 2009 article in the New York Times pointed out that polyurethane foam, a primary component of traditional mattresses, is made from petroleum.

Mary Cordaro, a healthy building and interiors consultant for decades, recommends using only natural latex, organic cotton, and natural, chemical-free wool in mattresses. Walter Bader reminds us to avoid propaganda perpetuated by mattress retailers claiming to be “chemical free.” When shopping for an organic mattress, ignore the "green" or "eco" ratings.  They are unregulated and therefore likely false claims. Okeo-Tex is an independent third-party rating company whereby mattress companies can voluntarily have their product rated. The only rating that is meaningful in the world of mattresses is "organic."

Greater awareness of the importance of a non-toxic sleep environment has given rise to several companies committed to making organic mattresses. Mary Cordaro recommends Green for Bedroom and Baby. Walter Bader co-founded Lifekind, which makes organic bedding and pillows in addition to mattresses. Other online sources are Dremata and Green Mattress Factory. In the Los Angeles area, check out Living Green in Culver City.  Essentia in Santa Monica claims to be non-toxic, but some research suggests they are making false claims.  For a checklist on how to choose a healthy mattress, click here.

Do you sleep on an organic mattress? Share your feedback below.




Tuesday, October 18, 2011

The Facts About BPA


Bisphenol A, or BPA, is a harmful chemical found in some plastics. Governor Brown recently signed legislation that will ban the use of BPA in baby bottles and child sippy cups as of July 2013. While this is great news, use of BPA is widespread, and I strongly recommend you avoid using products that contain it.  It is commonly found in plastic bottles (#7 in particular) and in the lining of canned goods. It is also used in thermal cash register receipts, so it's important to throw such receipts away rather than recycle them to help break the cycle of BPA in our environment.


BPA is xenobiotic, meaning it mimics life. Its structure is similar to that of estrogen, allowing it to get into the body and act like a toxic estrogen. This results in weight gain and loss of DNA integrity. Young women are experiencing periods earlier in life due to BPA, and for older women BPA makes menopause worse by blocking healthy estrogen. In men it contributes to breast development, lack of sex drive, and prostatitis. It's also linked to other conditions such as infertility, PCOS, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.

The Environmental Working Group has a great guide on how to avoid bisphenol A.  [edited on March 27, 2012 to add:]  Real Age has also published an article on how to avoid BPA. Educate yourself and lower your chance of BPA's adverse health effects.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Vitamin Use and Longevity

A study published in the October 10 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine claims that multivitamin use is associated with an increased risk of mortality in women in their 60s. There is no cause for alarm: this study is flawed. It was poorly done, with a small population, and with wildly broad variables, including lifestyle factors and the person’s overall toxicity burden to begin with. Around 39,000 women were surveyed in 1986, 1997, and 2004. The results were based on questionnaires these women filled out. There was no control study group; the results were just measured against statistics from the general population. Essentially, 39,000 women were measured against another 39,000 women, but where did those other 39,000 women come from? What slice of the population were they in? A response by Thorne Research points out “it must be emphasized that… the study is a retrospective study of already collected data. It is not a prospective, controlled intervention study, i.e., it is not a ‘clinical trial,’ in which participants would be given a specific dietary supplement or a placebo and then followed closely over time to observe not only the specific outcomes but also the factors possibly contributing to those outcomes.”

We need to take into consideration who funds multimillion dollar studies such as the one published in Archives of Internal Medicine:  the pharmacological companies who want exclusive rights to patent these ingredients. They are not a source to be trusted.

Additionally, there is no mention of the quality of the brand of multivitamin used. Commonplace multivitamins like Centrum always show up as toxic when I test them on my patients. In this way, the findings of this study are accurate: they prove that taking a toxic supplement will shorten your life span.

The supplements I recommend for my patients are purity-certified with consistent third party testing to confirm that purity. They’re made under the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) seal, which means that they’re high quality, pure, and that their ingredients contain exactly what is listed on the label. Countless studies prove that quality micronutrients signal to your DNA to express health and promote efficient detoxification.

Avoiding toxic supplements is just as important as avoiding toxic household products and cosmetics. Check the Environmental Working Group’s Cosmetic Safety Database to find out what’s in the cosmetic products you are exposing your body to every day.  I am happy to test you on all supplements, medications, and cosmetics you use to ensure that you are not putting toxins into your body. Together we will put you on the path to well-being and longevity.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Vaccination: The Other Side

The recent LA Times articles on vaccination does not give voice to the other side: parents of vaccine-injured children. Nor does it explain the risks associated with vaccines.  For more facts, visit the National Vaccine Information Center website.  Good journalism always shows both sides of an issue and the LA Times has failed in these articles.

Monday, July 25, 2011

My Take on MyPlate


Last month, the USDA announced it had discarded its hard-to-interpret Food Pyramid  and replaced it with “MyPlate,” a simple, colorful, icon designed to teach Americans how to eat more healthily. The pyramid was terribly flawed (it suggested 6-11 daily servings of “bread, cereal, rice, and pasta,” for example) and MyPlate is an improvement on that. The USDA’s website encourages us to “enjoy your food, but eat less,” and “avoid oversized portions,” which are great ways to avoid adrenal burnout and maintain a healthy metabolism and weight. 

Though I disagree with some of its recommendations, the good news is that MyPlate emphasizes vegetables and fruits. If I were to create my own version of MyPlate, I would use half the plate for vegetables, eliminate the dairy category, and move fruits over to where dairy is now: eat fruit for dessert. All the meats would be grass fed, and the produce would be organic. Looking at MyPlate’s grains serving, if you are under 22, it’s okay to include whole, unprocessed, gluten-free grains as 25% of every meal. Most adults, however, should be eating far less.

MyPlate also doesn’t take food allergies and sensitivities into consideration. Many people suffer from allergies and sensitivities that have not been diagnosed. Making a blanket statement that everyone should eat grains and dairy is unwise.

On an interesting side note, the federal subsidies that support farming are not in line with MyPlate at all. MyPlate shows us that each meal should be comprised of about 50% fruits and vegetables, yet fruit and vegetable farmers receive less than 1% of subsidies. Please contact your congresspeople to let them know that while MyPlate is a step in the right direction, the government needs to alter its agricultural policies in order to truly promote healthy eating.